How One May View Miracles
The author references the incident in Florida of the tractor-trailer which rear-ended a school bus carrying 21 children, where Frances M. Schee, age 13, was tragically killed.
The author (atheist) states: ‘Evidently, this is how miracles work. An innocent child dies and others survive.’
The Christian (Jim Yancey) states: ‘This was a tragedy, but it's also a miracle…We're lucky one person got out of there alive.’
So, How One May View Miracles seems to be the old half-full/half-empty glass of water thought. It is comparative in our nature to believe it was indeed a miracle of God, because ‘We're lucky one person got out of there alive,’ but seemingly just as easy to discount it as a miracle of God because ‘An innocent child dies and others survive.’
The author does ask a valid question, ‘What do you think the parents of the dead 13-year-old girl thought when they read your quote in the local paper, Superintendent?’ But only the parents themselves can answer that.
Now, according to the article and Atheist Revolution, the superintendent’s quotes were, ‘This was a tragedy, but it's also a miracle’ and ‘We're lucky one person got out of there alive.’
I don’t know the parents of Frances M. Schee personally, but I fail to see how they would have a problem with what Jim Yancey said. It was indeed a tragedy for the loss of Frances M. Schee, yet clearly a miracle that the other children were rescued.
I would also question the use of the quote ‘But not to save the sweet, innocent, 13-year-old little girl who died. God must have put her near the flames for a reason just like he made the truck driver use his cell phone at the perfect moment’ assumingly credited to James Horton by the writer of The Stubborn Curmudgeon. I searched, but could not find such a quote or reference to ‘(CITRA, Fla.) TSC Newswire’ where the quote apparently is sited from. Possibly the writer of the blog is making a point, and it is not actually the words of James Horton.
To discount the rescue to dwell on the loss seems overly trying to make a point that doesn’t hold water. I’ll return to my thought: It is comparative in our nature to believe it was indeed a miracle of God, because ‘We're lucky one person got out of there alive,’ but seemingly just as easy to discount it as a miracle of God because ‘An innocent child dies and others survive.’
It is quite normal for the spiritual to see the miracle and the natural to discount it.
2 comments:
Btw, in the instance mentioned, I think Christians like you should thank Gawd for killing the child in the accident.
I mean, your Gawd supposedly "saved" all but one....sure, its his plan, his divine plan.....so, why are you not thanking gawd for that one miss?
"Thank Gawd for the death of the child."
Beast
The problem is that god is supposed to have infinite power.
This is how I see it.
If the one saving the children was a regular fireman, and he wasn't able to save one, but saved the others he's still a hero, it was just not humanly possible for him to save the last one.
However, if he was able to save the last one, but he choose not to, then he isn't a hero, because he could have saved the last child, yet he didnt, he didnt want to.
That's why if you say that it was god's will to save the other ones, it was also his will to let the girl die.
Post a Comment